Your translators are not doing their job. Your article gives the impression that this convicted person is a Jehovah's Witness or some offshoot sect of J.W.'S. At one point in life apparently he was but hasn't been for some time. Jehovah's Witnesses usually are very proactive when it comes to surgery when warranted but usually defer to bloodless procedures of which 100's of hospitals are engaged in for the benefit of all including non J.W.'s. Wether J.W.'s have their boys circumsized or not is the parents decision and nothing to do with doctrine. You might like to do your due dilligence and set the record straight.