Jodie Foster misses entirely the point of her own movie. Had she or her boyfriend had a concealed handgun, the boyfriend might not have been killed and Jodie's character beaten and raped.

Her whole descent into a killing machine could have been prevented.

Her assailants didn't use guns (the trailers show). So what would disarming law-abiding citizens caught in real incidents such as portrayed in her movie, where the blood is real, not fake?

Buffoonery.

Jodie ,does that include all law enforcment and the military in the states ?? Armed personal protection ??It seems that you are on the same plane as Rosie O"Donnell .

Hard to take Ms. Foster's position serious as she reaps the reward for portraying gun toting characters. Can you say hypocrite?

No, like many who lean Left, Ms. Foster does not consider police officers and soldiers to be thinking, feeling, breathing human beings. That's why many people who lean Left have long referred to them as _pigs_ and _baby-killers_. That's why they consider cops' lives to be less valuable than the lives of the street criminals they arrest.

Likewise, an intelligent actor such as herself might hire an armed bodyguard -- but she'd never have dinner with one.

And what would handcuffing the police with counterproductive restrictions have accomplished if ordinary private citizens are to be allowed to protect _themselves_ from the victims of society who rob them?