Ancient earth is changing if you consider it minus humans, man as usual has a need to "control" the situation, raise alarms, what if this is natural change, not global warming as scientist say? I agree with these scientist. It is better than agreeing with global warmers who want people to die for the sake of "green" and their belief they can control nature again, you don't control nature, nature is stronger than man, and will do as it will. You can not stop what is happening it is beyond your control. More disaster will happen as earth naturally changes just as if we were not here. Perhaps the humans need to all leave, Earth would still be here doing its thing with or without us.

I have a look at lots global warming reports and then I look at all places they say that the ice is melting. There has been volcanoes in the areas and several eruption. We then thought global Warming was a lie. It is natural, science does not look at history very well. Climate change has gone on since the beginning of the world. In fact without global warming the earth would freeze and we will all die. So the ice is melting and we are killing the worlds is no more then lobbyist and government way of suckering our money way from ignorant, apocalyptic thinkers. I see where Al Gore stands to make a lot of money from cap and trade. lmao, be is simply playing on apocalyptic fears of people too lazy to do any research.

In the universe there is a natural balance of action and opposite reaction like black/ white, good/bad etc. Global warming is just a set up for a small ice age. The first volcano in Iceland, then the magma rise in Greenland, causing lower level melting has caused the glacier to slide into the ocean. This will stop the Golf stream flow. The jet stream and golf stream are connected as part of the earth's life cycle. When this happens all hell will break loose.It is best to find a safe place near the Equator, where maybe I will see you.

Watch listen and survive.

Robert.M. Watson Indiana

Thank You for showing both intelligence and reason. I believe that you are correct because I was looking for this same specific possibilty, and had typed in the specific keywords. In other words a projection test of a theorem.
The Vostok ice core and the Greenland ice core both agree. Due to the nature of the cores however, the quantitative data must be considered corrupt due to slow diffusion approaching a balance, but never reaching it, and therefore invalid. The qualitative data showing pointa of inflection is still fully valid. The latter indicates a planetary body massive enough to effect the sun in regards to the earth that passes though about every 10,000 years. This has to be observed for what comes next. Essentially, our companion may every two or three rounds cause the sun to make havoc on the Earth and the icecores may show this within the great cycle of 100,000 more or less years, but othrerwise has absolutely no effect on the greenland icecap.
Every 80,000 years to 120,000 years the northern hemisphere experiences a major event where Greenland melts down in total, not just the edges. It is overdue. This can be deduced because of the agreement between Greenland and Vostok. However, greenland shows one cycle vs four for vostok. Therefore Greenland melted down to start a new icecap.
It is possible that the weight of the ice may be the trigger. The ice drives the land into the hotspot, the area melts down, destoys human life as we know it, and 100,000 years later it happens again.