| |
 Guest
There is no real comparison between the HPV and HBV vaccines. The vectors are more widespread for HBV, whereas HPV is only transmitted by a single route. I am completely confident that my daughter, who would have been affected by this vaccine, is not now, nor will she for some time to come, at risk of exposure to this route. I know best for my daughter on the basis of both parenting and medicine.
|
|
Replied on Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Guest
There is no evidence that Gardasil prevents cervical cancer because it was never tested for preventing cervical cancer. The Wall Street Journal, 4/16/2007, in a front page article exposed the dubious claims of Merck for this vaccine.
On April 18, 2007, Cancer Monthly went even further, explaining that HPV does not, on its own, cause cervical cancer.
With adverse event reports of seizures, convulsions, and internal bleeding now being reported to the Federal Government's VAERS web site and the idea that this vaccine prevents cervical cancer debunked, why is this vaccine still on the market? And why is there not a Congressional investigation of Merck's false claims on Gardasil along with Vioxx.
|
|
Replied on Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:00 AM
|
|
|
|
| |